Kamis, 24 Februari 2011

Marketing Pilgrim Published: “R.I.P MyBlogLog – Yahoo Announces Shutdown of Service” plus 4 more

Marketing Pilgrim Published: “R.I.P MyBlogLog – Yahoo Announces Shutdown of Service” plus 4 more

Link to Andy Beal's Marketing Pilgrim

R.I.P MyBlogLog – Yahoo Announces Shutdown of Service

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 06:17 AM PST

After many rumors over the past twelve months, Yahoo has officially announced the shutdown of MyBlogLog in an email to users:

Dear MyBlogLog Customer,

You have been identified as a customer of Yahoo! MyBlogLog. We will officially discontinue Yahoo! MyBlogLog effective May 24, 2011. Your agreement with Yahoo!, to the extent that it applies to the Yahoo! MyBlogLog, will terminate on May 24, 2011.

After May 24, 2011 your credit card will no longer be charged for premium services on MyBlogLog. We will refund you the unused portion of your subscription, if any. The refund will appear as a credit via the billing method we have on file for you. To make sure that your billing information is correct and up to date, visit https://billing.yahoo.com.

Questions?
If you have questions about these changes, please visit the Yahoo! MyBlogLog help pages.

We thank you for being a customer on Yahoo! MyBlogLog.

Sincerely,

The Yahoo! My BlogLog Team

As I’ve said before, never has a great service gone so rapidly downhill after being acquired.

R.I.P MyBlogLog


Overstock Overstocks .edu Links and Google Schools Them

Posted: 23 Feb 2011 09:10 PM PST

Google has handed out another penalty to a high profile retail site after it discovered that the site's techniques to get to the top of the SERP's was not above board. This is the second high profile public flogging by Google of a rogue site in the past few weeks. Couple this with the strong 'war on spam' rhetoric and one might think that Google is starting to pay much closer attention to who gets where in their results and how they get there.

The Wall Street Journal reports

Google Inc. is penalizing Overstock.com Inc. in its search results after the retailer ran afoul of Google policies that prohibit companies from artificially boosting their ranking in the Internet giant’s search engine.

Overstock’s pages had recently ranked near the top of results for dozens of common searches, including “vacuum cleaners” and “laptop computers.” But links to Overstock on Tuesday dropped to the fifth or sixth pages of Google results for many of those categories, greatly reducing the chances that a user would click on its links.

The incident, according to Overstock, stemmed in part from its practice of encouraging websites of colleges and universities to post links to Overstock pages so that students and faculty could receive discounts on the shopping site. Overstock said it discontinued the program on Feb. 10, before hearing from Google, but said some university webmasters have been slow to remove the links.

In Overstock's hunt for the supposed almighty .edu link they committed the ultimate search engine optimization sin of getting too greedy. In search you apparently CAN have too much of a good thing, especially of that good thing are links with a .edu extension.

Although we may never know exactly who did it, the downfall of Overstock came from the dreaded 'narc out' to Google. The WSJ article says

The change followed a complaint by a competitor last week to Google about Overstock’s actions.

Overstock, which is based in Salt Lake City, was founded in 1999 and is known for discount merchandise. It had 10 million unique visitors last month, according to comScore.

Will this open the floodgates of sites looking to report each other for indiscretions? Are the days of SEO's practicing an 'honor amongst thieves' code over? When it comes to making money, making friends often is not part of the equation and we all know that big rankings can mean big money. Is this one of those cases or is this simply a competitor doing the damage to Overstock and not a sideways SEO?

What is most interesting about the WSJ article is its treatment of SEO for its readers. It acts as if it is some kind of sacred ritual that is reserved for obscure religions that use animals and the like to work their magic. It describes SEO in general like this

Many companies use a variety of techniques to try to enhance their positions in search results, a practice called search engine optimization, or SEO. Appearing higher on pages containing search results tends to attract greater attention among the many customers who hunt for goods or services through Google and other search engines. Some companies hire SEO services to help elevate their rankings.

After 15 plus years of this practice going on in varying degrees of complexity its pretty amusing to see the WSJ telling its readers the great secret of the Internet in kindergarten level language. Oh, and some companies even HIRE someone to do this SEO thing for them. How 007 of them!

So in light of the JC Penney SEO incident and now the Overstock penalty are you nervous for your rankings? Is there a disgruntled employee lurking about with your deep dark SEO secrets that may want to put a dent in your efforts? The more that Google acts on these calls to their SEO 'tip line' (and it happens in public) will there be a rush to bring down the top search dogs? It would make sense wouldn't it?

So what's your take on this increasingly hostile environment in the world of SEO?


Into The Minds of Link Builders

Posted: 23 Feb 2011 09:05 PM PST

This isn’t a hidden fact; link building is the missing piece of most online marketing plans. Onsite SEO and content are just part of the game, but there is no part of code you can change that will have an impact on ranking like good, strong, focused links to your site’s pages. Naturally, link building is the one thing we all hate doing. Most SEOs, when you mention link building, will either groan and put their headphones back on, or just cry. But it is a necessary part of SEO.

So instead of drowning out the part of your to-do list, or bawling, how about we get directions from three of the top minds in link building. I sent questions to some of my favorite link builders and mashed up their answers to give you some insight from those that truly love link building. If you want more after this post, check out some more top minds discussing link building at the Distilled Link Building Seminar in New Orleans or London.

Without further adieu, our link building ninjas are:

Julie Joyce owns Link Fish Media, Inc, a link development company headquartered in Greensboro, NC that focuses on helping clients in ultra-competitive niches all over the world. She also really likes pub snacks.

Ben Wills is the CEO and Co-Founder of Ontolo. While working at the largest SEO company in the early 2000s, he designed and directed implementation for thousands of SEO campaigns. And thus began his focus on scale and automation. While not figuring out hard SEO and link building problems, he road trips thousands of miles a year and rock climbs whenever his body and schedule lets him. Following him on Twitter: @benwills

Brian McDowell focuses on product development and customer success for Conductor. McDowell has designed and built multiple in-house proprietary technologies for natural search and built large in house teams consisting of developers and junior level SEO practitioners for companies such as LendingTree, RealEstate.com, Market America and Red Ventures.

Please note that these answers have been edited. If you want to see their full answers, download this Link Building Full Interviews. On to the questions:

You do something most SEOs hate to do, why? (Dear God Why?)

Julie: Haha! Honestly, I really love it. It’s tedious, it’s hell at times … I think it’s quite difficult to do well and that forces those of us doing it to constantly try to think of creative ways to keep going and stop the wall from coming down. There’s something very satisfying about seeing an amazing link … I’ve never felt like that looking at a meta tag.

Brian: It is exciting to measure and analyze specific tactics and techniques in order to get a better understanding of how external factors enhance (or dilute) your SERP positioning. Link building is a science and it takes a lot of effort to do properly.

Ben: Honestly? After 7 years of it, I got bored with SEO. … I realized that the problem of link building hadn’t been solved well and that I hadn’t built an idea I’d always wanted to. Boredom? Cured.

Is there one tool that is completely indispensible to you?

Ben: Ours :) I say that cheekily, but it’s also true. I really don’t like doing the same task twice and so we’ve built numerous tools around each of those tasks.

Julie: Rex Swain’s HTTP Header Check – It’s just so old school it’s crazy, and it’s amazing how many people do not use 301s properly. If I’m building links to a site, I’d at least like that redirect to be in there!

Brian: Tools to help with Automation – hands down. Good SEOs use tools to automate their efforts and become more efficient.

What is the one thing you wish you knew when you first started in link building?

Julie: I wish I’d known how worthless Google’s Toolbar PageRank is as a link building metric. (Amen Sista!)

Ben: It might be a rough road, that I’m not going to get it right from the beginning, and that that’s really ok and might be the best way to go.

Brian: I wish I knew the importance of auditing my investments (both pre and post publish). Audits are used to monitor your link investments in order to make sure your links are live, constructed properly and live in good neighborhoods. Fixing broken links (including internal 404s) should be considered another tactic in link building and not just general maintenance.

If you took on a client looking for link building help, what is the first thing they should know?

Brian: What are the expectations of these sites and what are they using to measure the level of success. I’d want them to know to focus on distributed relevance without a hyper focus on a specific term. Link building takes time and should have consistent and sustained growth. Patience is needed and the amount of time is purely dependent on the competitive landscape for their niche and which terms they are targeting. I’d ask things like:

• Does the customer care about lead generation, online sales, incoming calls or just visibility?
• How quickly can changes be made to the site (important in link building for managing relevance)?
• What analytics package and use of Google and/or Bing Webmaster Tools?
• Is the customer currently using an SEO platform to track and monitor their efforts?

Ben: Link building is the least measurable form of marketing in terms of impact on rankings. No one knows how to value a link right now in terms of search rankings and ROI…the math is simply too complex and constantly changing. Even if you figured it out, it would be irrelevant pretty quickly.

Julie: The first thing we tell people requesting a quote is that we do buy links and that paid links are risky business. We don’t just buy links, but link buying is definitely our specialty. If they are comfortable with the risk and I am comfortable with it, things progress, but if one of us isn’t, we part ways immediately.

What link building technique or source of links do you think is under used / undervalued by SEOs right now?

Julie: That’s a tough one. I definitely have a soft spot for good paid links so I’d probably say that those are the most undervalued types of links. I think there’s an assumption that all paid links are horrible spammy ones on irrelevant one-page sites, but it’s absolutely not true. Really nice paid links that are relevant, don’t leave a footprint, and drive traffic are definitely undervalued.

Brian: The ones I use. :P On a serious note, I think infographics are something that not enough people focus on. They require a creative mind, a great designer and a data analyst to work together and produce something amazing enough to be shared. Good infographics have a long lifespan, generate links and references as well as good social citations.

Ben: The most undervalued technique is more of a well-designed strategy that’s consistently executed, day in and day out. We hear a lot about one-off efforts, but rarely about recurring strategies that build on themselves over time.

When it comes to international or localized search, any tips on how to get links from your area?

Brian: Street teams work great. Shake some hands and kiss some babies to get the job done. Network. Is your lunch hour worth a link? Absolutely. Offer to exchange some SEO knowledge and straight up ask for the link. If you do not have easy access to the geographical area, become a part of its community: sponsor events and work with the local news media.

Julie: It depends on where the target market is. If you’re a UK site but you do business all over, I’d not be as keen to suggest as high a percentage of .co.uk links as I would be if you only sold in the UK itself. I don’t pay as much attention to hosting location … Relevant language links are nice if you’re working in a foreign language. In terms of how to get them, I always go back to the emailed link request. People say it doesn’t work but it works for us (perhaps because we’re offering cash!) For something non-paid, I think there is a massive amount of ideas too numerous to name here, but content and social media would be driving forces there.

Ben: For international, I would say to offer something unique to that area/country and distribute it through well-connected experts in that country. For local? Get involved! There are so many local opportunities from local bloggers to volunteering to holding free local events. I can’t stress enough how much simply "showing up" can help with local link building. If you’re in it for the long haul, "show up" to something new once a week for 3 months. After that, you’ll know better than anyone consultant could tell you what opportunities are out there.

What is the biggest misconception in link building today?

Julie: I’m going to harp on paid links here but I do think it’s that all paid links are crap. Secondly, I’d say that it’s the idea that you can compete in an ultra-competitive niche without buying links. People say it’s possible but no one is willing to step up and point you to an actual example. I can’t really imagine telling a client like that to just write great content.

Brian: That spending time and resources on link building is not necessary or a priority. On the flip side, a great link profile will only get you so far if you have poor site structure. SEO is a hybrid of technical aptitude with a deep understanding of industry best practices and a creative mind for marketing and brand management.

What sites/blogs would you recommend for people looking to learn about link building?

• Linkspiel.com
• paulmadden.co.uk
• wiep.net
• Ontolo.com/blog (Garrett French)
• blog.conductor.com
• seomoz.org/blog
• Distilled.co.uk/blog/
• seoroundtable.com

What is the most creative link building tactic you've ever seen?

Ben: People might not like it when I say this, but I’d say that negative reviews for that glasses company that imploded late last year was pretty creative. In poor taste and unethical? Yep. Creative? Absolutely.

Julie: I’d have to say that Lyndon Antcliff’s fake news bait was amazing. Not only did he fool people, he divided people, and he got our attention. I like a nice prank anyway so I thought the whole thing was hysterical. The story is still up and look at the backlinks!

Brian: A competitor built a site that had free hit counters before this tactic became mainstream. The hit counter site was clean and actually looked fairly decent. In order to use their "free hit counters" you had to use their code and accept the marketing agreement.

What I particularly liked about this hit counter site was the fact that they ranked #1 in PPC for many niche keywords and often times they were the only result. They were effectively buying clicks for people to put the hit counters on their site. The real cash cow here was that the hit counters came with a link to their many properties in multiple ways. Some links had keyword rich anchor text, some links were exact URLs and others were brand names. There was also the existence of image links with great alt text and titles. These links were distributed across a wide population of unrelated pages and the tactic was fairly effective for a long period of time.

I loved this approach since they were effectively attracting amateur webmasters looking for a free basic analytics tool (tracking visits). While something like this wouldn't work well today (not that people aren't trying) the reason I loved this was that it embodied the creative nature of link building in a new and unique way.

THE AUTHOR: Kate Morris is an SEO at Distilled. They are running two link building conferences – in New Orleans on 25th March and in London on 18th March. The focus is on actionable tips and tricks so if you need more links, these events are the places to be.


And MySpace Came a Tumbling Down

Posted: 23 Feb 2011 04:15 PM PST

I feel bad for MySpace. They came to us with a plan to socialize the internet. It was an easy way for everyone, from the student to the CEO to get together and share their interests, their thoughts and the ups and downs of their day. With a single click, strangers from across the world could become friends. It’s like that old Coca-Cola commercial where people of every race, creed and color stand hand-in-hand while they learn to sing in perfect harmony.

So what happened? How did MySpace go from harmony to off-key? Is it simply a case of not being the popular kid on the block anymore? Even after the recent upgrades, are they still that far off the mark?

Check out this Chart-of-the-Day from Silicon Alley Insider. It’s a cold, hard look at the end of an era.


I hear that MySpace started out as an online data storage site, thus the name. Perhaps this is a business model they should reconsider.

What do you think? Is this scenario unique to MySpace or will all social networking sites end up biting the bullet just as badly one day?


Most People Leave Twitter Because it’s Pointless

Posted: 23 Feb 2011 02:45 PM PST

52% of people who stopped using Twitter said they did it because they realized Twitter was pointless. Imagine that. The stat comes from the latest installment of ExactTarget’s Subscribers, Fans and Followers report. This one is called “The Social Breakup” and it’s all about why people stop following a brand on social media.

Yesterday, we talked about Facebook. Today, it’s all about Twitter.

On the upside, people said they liked Twitter because the messages were short, it provided unprecedented accessibility and even more than email or Facebook, Twitter was seen as a two-way street. Though more than half the people who started a Twitter account have stopped using it, the ones that stay are very active and they’re ready to engage in conversation.

For the marketer, that means that monitoring your Twitter accounts and Twitter in general is crucial. Checking in once a day isn’t going to cut it. Twitter moves faster than any other social media network so a response that takes 24 hours is really more like a week in social media years.

Being responsive, doesn’t mean firing off marketing Tweets every hour. Too many repetitive or boring posts was the number one reason people stopped following a brand on Twitter. As with Facebook, too much general clutter was a close second and 27% said they only followed the brand for a one-time deal.

Very few people, only 12% said they left a brand because their own circumstances and needs had changed. That means that the overwhelming majority of the responsibility lies with you, the marketer. People will stay connected as long as you hit that magic number of informational versus entertaining Tweets. What that number is, however, is anybody’s guess.


Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar